head	1.3;
access;
symbols;
locks
	ids:1.3; strict;
comment	@# @;


1.3
date	2001.10.05.19.24.57;	author ids;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.2;

1.2
date	2000.10.15.17.44.59;	author ids;	state Exp;
branches;
next	1.1;

1.1
date	99.04.27.18.07.16;	author ids;	state Exp;
branches;
next	;


desc
@@


1.3
log
@wow! these new PCs we've got *are* fast!
So: further keeping up with Moore's law.
@
text
@0.03	1	20000	(MAX_REL_DISP, PLOT_HOW_OFTEN, PRINT_HOW_OFTEN)

star_1		3.3e30		-3e16 -2e16 6e16	-100  -60  70	comments
star_2		3.3e30		0     7e16  -1e16	120   -180  -30
star_3		3.3e30		1e16  -2e16 -7e16	60   130   -100
star_4		3.3e30		3e16  0     0		170   250   130
star_5		3.3e30		-7e16 1e16  -1e16	-40  -140  -80
star_6		3.3e30		-7e16 -3e16 9e16	-250  -110  400
star_7		3.3e30		2e16  -8e16 -4e16	-120    130    280
star_8		3.3e30		7e16  1e16  -5e16	170   -200  -70
star_9		3.3e30		4e16  4e16  0		50   -130   -180
star_10		3.3e30		-3e16 3e16  4e16	-90  120   -210

star_11		3.3e30		-4e16 -2e16 -6e16	-90  -60  170	comments
star_12		3.3e30		0     -7e16  1e16	-20   -130  -130
star_13		3.3e30		1e16  2e16 8e16		110   30   -190
star_14		3.3e30		9e16  0     6e16	170   150   190
star_15		3.3e30		0 1e16  -6e16		-150  -120  70
star_16		3.3e30		7e16 -2e16 -9e16	-40  -100  290
star_17		3.3e30		2e16  0 -4e16		0    10    200
star_18		3.3e30		7e16  5e16  -5e16	100   -120  -270
star_19		3.3e30		4e16  -4e16  0		150   120   -80
star_20		3.3e30		-7e16 9e16  -4e16	-60  20   -100

star_21		3.3e30		-3e16 2e16 -6e16	-150  60  150	comments
star_22		3.3e30		0     17e16  -1e16	-40   190  -80
star_23		3.3e30		1e16  2e16 0		160   -300   -210
star_24		3.3e30		-3e16  0     10e16	-170   150   110
star_25		3.3e30		-7e16 -1e16  8e16	-140  140  -60
star_26		3.3e30		-1e16 -4e16 -9e16	-250  -110  140
star_27		3.3e30		9e16  -8e16 -4e16	0    0    0
star_28		3.3e30		-3e16  6e16  -6e16	-110   120  70
star_29		3.3e30		8e16  4e16  2e16	-250   230   -180
star_30		3.3e30		-3e16 3e16  0		-150  120   210
@


1.2
log
@changed to keep up with Moore's law!
(The gravity program runs at least 10 times as fast as it did back in 1993.
 So, to at least partly compensate, we print 10 times less often,
 avoiding an avalanche of trace outputs; and since a typical run will go
 much further into the simulated future - for any equal amount of human
 patience! - than before, we turn down the maximum relative displacement
 tolerated, thus keeping the accuracy good over such a long haul.)
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
0.05	1	2000	(MAX_REL_DISP, PLOT_HOW_OFTEN, PRINT_HOW_OFTEN)
@


1.1
log
@Initial revision
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
0.1	1	200	(MAX_REL_DISP, PLOT_HOW_OFTEN, PRINT_HOW_OFTEN)
@